Logo Logo

Zitation: Diefenbach, Sarah und Ullrich, Daniel und Lindermayer, Tim und Isaksen, Kaja-Lena: Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses Through Automation in Human-Computer Interaction from a Psychological Perspective. (Study 1 and Study 2). 29. Juli 2024. Open Data LMU. 10.5282/ubm/data.514

Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses Through Automation in Human-Computer Interaction from a Psychological Perspective. (Study 1 and Study 2)
Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses Through Automation in Human-Computer Interaction from a Psychological Perspective. (Study 1 and Study 2)

Robots and smart technologies become part of everyday life and private households. While this automation of mundane tasks typically creates pragmatic benefits (e.g., efficiency, accuracy, time savings), it may also come with psychological losses, such as in meaning, competence, or re-sponsibility. Depending on the domain (e.g., AI-assisted surgery, automated decision making), especially the user's felt responsibility could have far-reaching consequences. The present re-search systematically explores such effects, building a more structured base for responsible au-tomation in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Based on a framework of seven dimensions, study 1 (N=122) evaluates users' reflections on automating five mundane tasks (e.g., gardening, paperwork) and identifies reasons for or against automation in different domains (e.g., creativi-ty, care work, decision making). Study 2 (N=57) provides deeper insights into effects of automa-tion on responsibility perceptions. Based on the example of a vacuum cleaner robot, an experi-mental laboratory study contrasted a non-robotic manual vacuum cleaner to a robot, whereby the user's perceptions of device agency (higher for the robot) and own competence (higher for the manual device) were central mediator for the perceived responsibility for the result. We po-sition our findings as part of a broader idea of responsible design and automation from a us-er-centered design perspective. Data to: Diefenbach, S., Ullrich, D., Lindermayer, T., & Isaksen, K.-L. (2024). Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses through Automation in Human–Computer Interaction from a Psychological Perspective. Information, 15(8), 460. doi:10.3390/info15080460

Not available
Diefenbach, Sarah
Ullrich, Daniel
Lindermayer, Tim
Isaksen, Kaja-Lena
2024

[thumbnail of ResponsibleAutomation_Study1] Other (ResponsibleAutomation_Study1)
ResponsibleAutomation_Study1.sav

252kB
[thumbnail of ResponsibleAutomation_Study2] Other (ResponsibleAutomation_Study2)
ResponsibleAutomation_Study2.sav

11kB
[thumbnail of Readme zu ResponsibleAutomation_Study] Plain Text (Readme zu ResponsibleAutomation_Study)
Readme_ResponsibleAutomation_Study.txt

1kB

DOI: 10.5282/ubm/data.514

Dieser Datensatz steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz
CC BY 4.0

Be­schrei­bung

Robots and smart technologies become part of everyday life and private households. While this automation of mundane tasks typically creates pragmatic benefits (e.g., efficiency, accuracy, time savings), it may also come with psychological losses, such as in meaning, competence, or re-sponsibility. Depending on the domain (e.g., AI-assisted surgery, automated decision making), especially the user's felt responsibility could have far-reaching consequences. The present re-search systematically explores such effects, building a more structured base for responsible au-tomation in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Based on a framework of seven dimensions, study 1 (N=122) evaluates users' reflections on automating five mundane tasks (e.g., gardening, paperwork) and identifies reasons for or against automation in different domains (e.g., creativi-ty, care work, decision making). Study 2 (N=57) provides deeper insights into effects of automa-tion on responsibility perceptions. Based on the example of a vacuum cleaner robot, an experi-mental laboratory study contrasted a non-robotic manual vacuum cleaner to a robot, whereby the user's perceptions of device agency (higher for the robot) and own competence (higher for the manual device) were central mediator for the perceived responsibility for the result. We po-sition our findings as part of a broader idea of responsible design and automation from a us-er-centered design perspective. Data to: Diefenbach, S., Ullrich, D., Lindermayer, T., & Isaksen, K.-L. (2024). Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses through Automation in Human–Computer Interaction from a Psychological Perspective. Information, 15(8), 460. doi:10.3390/info15080460

Dokumententyp:Daten
Name der Kontakt­person:Diefenbach, Sarah
E-Mail der Kontaktperson:sarah.diefenbach at psy.lmu.de
Fächer:Psychologie und Pädagogik
Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik
Dewey Dezimal­klassi­fikation:000 Allgemeines, Informatik, Informationswissenschaft > 004 Informatik
100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
ID Code:514
Eingestellt von: Prof. Sarah Diefenbach
Eingestellt am:31. Jul. 2024 14:48
Letzte Änderungen:06. Aug. 2024 08:29

Nur für Administratoren und Editoren: Dokument bearbeiten