An integral part of VerbaAlpina is the direct and independent publication of results, since not everything that is referred to as publication serves PUBLICATION. For instance, print as an established medium causes the strict opposite: It deprives the public of information which should be accessible to the greatest possible extent, considering the research promotion through public funding, and the effortless usability of new media. The traditional 200 or 300 printed issues do not render an inclusive 'publicness', but an exclusive privacy. Thus, in the face of easily accessible information technology, there is no valid reason to prefer print or consider it the absolute mean of information distribution. Quite the contrary. The question arises why scientists should support media and institutions that systematically restrict the distribution of the results of their work.
In some academic disciplines (to our knowledge, this is true for computer science, among others), there has been an observed tendency over the past few years to lead the technological opportunities that go hand in hand with the new media ad absurdum. While world-wide access to information and texts could very easily be made obtainable, the complete opposite is the case: The data lies behind a paywall. This is even a setback from the traditional publication on paper that we have criticised above. At this point, we want to strongly warn of such developments which, to some extent, can already be observed within the humanities.
However, the concept of publication has changed substantially as well (cf. Krefeld 2019c, Chapter 3). In a broader sense, the following points are part of it:
